http://in.news.yahoo.com/48/20100913/1241/top-not-caste-in-stone_1.htmlNot caste in stone
Mon, Sep 13 06:25 AM
While readying for the deluge of data on various caste groups, now
that the cabinet has cleared the census of caste groups from next
year, we need to demolish some dominant caste myths.
The most important one, of course, is that caste groups are uniform
monoliths. Look at the data and there is no doubt that, at the
all-India level, upper castes will have higher incomes than other
backward castes — who, in turn, have higher incomes than Scheduled
Castes who earn more than Scheduled Tribes. At an all-India level,
upper caste households earn an average of Rs 86,690 per annum, OBCs
earn Rs 59,741, SCs Rs 45,889 and STs Rs 40,753. This data is from the
NCAER's annual household survey of income, since the government's
National Sample Survey captures only data on expenditure and, on
average, it is unable to capture more than half the total consumption
in the country. These numbers are from 2004-05, but the relative
differences across caste groups are valid even today.
The averages, like all averages, miss out on the important
differences. So, an analysis of the NCAER data (in the book Caste in a
Different Mould, of which I am a co-author) shows that while SC
households in Uttar Pradesh earn Rs 39,655 per annum, those in Punjab
earn Rs 63,055; OBCs in Bihar earn Rs 40,839 as against Rs 73,223 in
Maharashtra. Similar differences hold true for all caste groups. The
short point is incomes across caste groups differ widely across
various states, which means the overall level of development of the
state is more important than the caste of an individual when it comes
to determining income levels. So ST households in Karnataka earn Rs
62,238 per annum, more than upper-caste ones in Bihar (Rs 51,187).
The second myth, related to the first, is that differences in income
automatically imply discrimination, and therefore suggest affirmative
action is called for. Apart from the impact the "state" of
development, as it were, has on income levels, the differences are
largely explained by education, by the industry/service you are
employed in, by whether an individual is situated in a rural area or a
small town or a big metro, and the list can go on. Even where groups
are classified as 'graduate and above', if the group has more
post-graduates, income levels are certain to be higher.
So, for instance, OBC households in villages (73 per cent of OBCs are
to be found in villages) have an average annual income of Rs 51,740
but this goes up to Rs 72,288 in small towns, Rs 81,745 in mid-sized
towns (5-10 lakh population) and to Rs 95,999 in towns with more than
a million people. Some of this is just the location factor. A driver
in a village is going to get next to nothing while a driver in a metro
probably earns Rs 7,000, on average, a month.
There's education as well. So, a large part of the higher income
levels in urban settings are probably also a reflection of higher
education, not just location — but because it needs sophisticated
econometrics, and even that can go wrong, this is often ignored. An
OBC household that has is headed by an illiterate earns Rs 24,363 per
year, and this rises to Rs 32,169 in case the head of the household
has studied till class V, Rs 67,371 in case s/he has studied till
class XII, and to Rs 105,285 in case the head of the household is a
graduate. Just 20 per cent of OBC households have graduates as
compared to 35 per cent for upper castes.
A recent study of Dalit villages in Uttar Pradesh by Devesh Kapur,
Chandra Bhan Prasad, Lant Pritchett and D. Shyam Babu confirms the
role urbanisation plays. In Azamgarh district, for instance, the study
found just 18.1 per cent of Dalit households lived in pucca houses in
1990, and this rose to 66.4 per cent in 2007. For Bulandshahr district
in western UP, the figures were 38.4 and 94.6 per cent respectively.
Ownership of television sets rose from 0.9 per cent to 22.2 per cent
in Azamgarh, and from 0.7 to 45 per cent in Bulandshahr. They found
similar changes for mobile phones, simple chairs in homes, fans and
even the use of shampoo, toothpaste and bottled hair oil. There are,
the authors say, several reasons for the change: the rise of Mayawati
could be one, as could economic reforms which led to greater
marketisation of the economy. One of the powerful reasons, the authors
conclude, is migration. While the eastern district of Azamgarh saw
dependence on family members who had migrated to urban areas rise from
14.5 per cent in 1990 to 50.5 per cent in 2007, Bulandshahr district
saw a much smaller rise. Compare this with the proportion of family
members living in the village, and this suggests that in Bulandshahr,
villagers were probably travelling out of the village for work in the
morning and returning the same day.
All of which would suggest the solution cannot be a uniform one. It
has to be education in some cases, urbanisation in some and
industrialisation in others. With over 75 per cent of ST households
having studied only till class X (38 per cent till just class V)
reservations in colleges are unlikely to be a solution, to cite one
instance. Affirmative action also poses a problem in terms of
implementation since 90 per cent of all ST households are in rural
areas.
In the case of Muslims, where the government hopes to fix things
through an Equal Opportunities Commission, it's worth keeping in mind
that nearly 90 per cent live in rural areas (64 per cent) and small
towns; Muslims have the highest proportion of households who are
self-employed in non-agricultural occupations (25.7 per cent versus
16.2 for Hindus) and the least who are salaried (13.1 per cent versus
18.8 per cent for all Hindus).
The moral of the story is that it's not so much about affirmative
action as it is about urbanisation, industrialisation and education.
Not that this is easy either. The agitation against land acquisition
in Uttar Pradesh shows the limits to the pace of urbanisation,
Niyamgiri and Singur does the same for industrialisation, and the
Right to Education Act, though wonderful in spirit, will end up
slowing the development of low-cost unrecognised private schools.
The writer is Opinion Editor, 'The Financial Express'
sunil.jain@expressindia.com
------------------------------------
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/
PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com
TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/
Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
