---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shiva Shankar <
sshankar@cmi.ac.in>
Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Subject: review of Joothan
To:
One of the greatest books to come out of India:
Omprakash Valmiki's JOOTHAN: A DALIT'S LIFE (translated by Arun Prabha
Mukherjee)
----------------------
'... Valmiki's narrative voice brims with a quiet sense of outrage at
what he had to endure as a human. Indeed, I'm inclined to see his
memoir as a form of Satyagraha: in reflecting back to others their own
violence and injustice, it attempts to shame them into introspection.
This is the kind of book that becomes 'the axe for the frozen sea
inside us.' More Indians ought to read it and let its hard edges get
to work inside them.'
Review By Namit Arora
A review of a memoir by an 'untouchable' starting in the 1950s in
rural Uttar Pradesh, India.
I grew up in the central Indian city of Gwalior until I left home for
college. This was the 70s and 80s. My father worked as a textile
engineer in a company town owned by the Birla Group, where we lived in
a middle class residential quarter for the professional staff and
their families. Our 3-BR house had a small front lawn and a vegetable
patch behind. Domestic helpers, such as a washerwoman and a
dishwashing woman, entered our house via the front door—all except
one, who came in via the rear door. This was the latrine cleaning
woman, or her husband at times. As in most traditional homes, our
squat toilet was near the rear door, across an open courtyard. She
also brought along a couple of scrawny kids, who waited by the
vegetable patch while their mother worked.
My mother often gave them dinner leftovers, and sometimes tea. But
unlike other domestic helpers, they were not served in our utensils,
nor did the latrine cleaners expect to be. They brought their own
utensils and placed them on the floor; my mother served them while
they stood apart. When my mother turned away, they quietly picked up
the food and left. To my young eyes this seemed like the natural order
of things. These were the mehtars, among the lowest of the so-called
'untouchables'. They worked all around us, yet were 'invisible' to me,
as if part of the stage props. I neither gave them much thought during
my school years, nor recognized my prejudices as such. I, and the kids
in my circle, even used 'untouchable' caste names as playful epithets,
calling each other chamaar and bhangi.
It's possible that I first reflected on the idea of untouchability
only in college, through art house cinema. Even so, upper caste Indian
liberals made these films and it was their viewpoint I saw. It is
hardly a stretch to say that the way even the most sensitive white
liberals in the US knew and described the black experience of America
is partly why one had to read Frederick Douglass, Ralph Ellison,
Richard Wright, James Baldwin, and other black authors. A similar
parallel holds for Native Americans, immigrants, and women, as well as
the 'untouchables,' now called Dalits ('the oppressed'), numbering one
out of six Indians. In recent years, they have begun to tell their own
stories, bearing witness to their slice of life in India. Theirs is
not only a powerful new current of Indian literature, it is also a
major site of resistance and revolt.
Joothan by Omprakash Valmiki is one such work of Dalit literature,
first published in Hindi in 1997 and translated into English by Arun
Prabha Mukherjee in 2003 (she added an excellent introduction in the
2007 edition). It is a memoir of growing up 'untouchable' starting in
the 1950s outside a typical village in Uttar Pradesh. Told as a series
of piercing vignettes, Joothan is also a remarkable record of a rare
Indian journey, one that took a boy from extremely wretched
socioeconomic conditions to prominence as an author and social critic.
§
Valmiki was born into the Chuhra caste (aka Bhangi), whose ordained
job it was to sweep the roads, clean the cattle barns, get shit off
the floor, dispose of dead animals, work the fields during harvests,
and perform other physical labor for upper caste people, including the
Tyagi Brahmins. The Tyagis didn't address them by name, only called
out, 'Oe Chuhre' or 'Abey Chuhre.' It was alright to touch cows and
stray dogs but touching a Chuhra inflicted instant 'pollution' on the
Tyagis. During his boyhood, his entire family worked hard, yet they
'didn't manage to get two decent meals a day,' not the least because
they often didn't get paid for their labor and instead 'got sworn at
and abused.'
The Chuhras were forced to live outside the village reserved for upper
caste people. A high wall and a pond segregated their brick houses in
the village from the Chuhra basti, or cluster of shanties. Upper caste
men and women of all ages came out and used the edge of the pond as an
open-air lavatory, squatting across from the Chuhra homes in broad
daylight with their private parts exposed. 'There was muck strewn
everywhere,' writes Valmiki. 'The stench was so overpowering that one
would choke within a minute. The pigs wandering in narrow lanes, naked
children, dogs, daily fights, this was the environment of my
childhood.'
In the rainy season, these narrow lanes of the basti filled up with
muddy water mixed-in with pigs' excrement; flies and mosquitoes
thrived. Everybody's arms and legs became mangy and developed itchy
sores. There was one drinking well in their basti for about thirty
families, and despite a guard wall around it, it became full of long
worms during the rainy season. They had no choice but to drink that
water, as they were not permitted to use the well of the upper caste
folks. Their homes were made of clay that sprang leaks all over.
During heavy rains, the ceilings or walls often collapsed, as it did
for Valmiki's house more than once. One season most of their homes
collapsed; as always, there was no outside help or insurance, and they
had to rebuild on their own.
What Valmiki had going for him was a headstrong set of parents,
determined to give him a better future. In 1955, despite Gandhi's work
on 'upliftment' and the new anti-discrimination laws on the books, his
father had a hard time getting him admission into a primary school.
When the boy finally got in, he was not allowed to sit on the benches
but on the floor, away from the upper caste boys, at the back by the
door, from where he couldn't see the blackboard well. Other boys
hurled epithets and beat him casually, turning him into a cowering
introverted kid. Even the teachers looked for excuses to punish him,
he writes, 'so that I would run away from the school and take up the
kind of work for which I was born.' In fourth grade, a new headmaster
arrived, who thrashed him almost daily and one day asked him to take a
broom and sweep all the rooms and the playground in school. The
hapless boy spent two full days sweeping, hoping it would soon be
over.
The third day I went to the class and sat down quietly. After a few
minutes the headmaster's loud thundering was heard: 'Abey Chuhre ke,
motherfucker, where are you hiding … your mother …' I had begun to
shake uncontrollably. A Tyagi boy shouted, 'Master Saheb, there he is,
sitting in the corner.'
The headmaster had pounced on my neck. The pressure of his fingers was
increasing. As a wolf grabs a lamb by the neck, he dragged me out of
the class and threw me on the ground. He screamed: 'Go sweep the whole
playground … Otherwise I will shove chillies up your arse and throw
you out of school.'
Frightened, I picked up the three-day-old broom [now only a cluster
of] thin sticks. Tears were falling from my eyes. I started to sweep
the compound while my tears fell. From the doors and windows of the
schoolrooms, the eyes of the teachers and the boys saw this spectacle.
Each pore of my body was submerged in an abyss of anguish.
As it turned out, his father was passing by that day and saw him
sweeping the grounds. Sobbing and overcome by hiccups, the boy told
him the story. Father snatched the broom and with eyes blazing, began
to scream, 'Who is that teacher, that progeny of Dronacharya, who
forces my son to sweep?' [1] All the teachers stepped out, including
the headmaster, who called his father names and roared back, 'Take him
away from here … The Chuhra wants him educated … Go, go … Otherwise I
will have your bones broken.'
On his way out, his father declared in a loud voice, 'I am leaving now
… but this Chuhre ka will study right here … In this school. And not
just him, but there will be more coming after him.' His father's
courage and fortitude left a deep and decisive mark on the boy's
personality. His father knocked on the doors of other upper caste men
he had worked for, hoping they would support him against the
headmaster, but the response was the opposite. He was plainly told:
'What is the point of sending him to school?' 'When has a crow become
a swan?' 'Hey, if he asked a Chuhra's progeny to sweep, what is the
big deal in that?' When his father had all but given up, one village
elder yielded to his tearful beseeching and intervened to get the boy
reinstated. A close call, else he would have ended up illiterate like
the rest of his family.
Most of his family worked at harvest time. For a hard day's labor,
which included harvesting lentils, cutting sheaves of wheat in the
midday sun, and transporting them via bullock carts, each person got
one out of 21 parts produced—about two pounds of wheat—as wages. For
the rest of their labor in the cowshed, they got paid in grain and a
leftover roti each day ('made by mixing the flour with the husk since
it was for the chuhras'), and at times scraps of leftovers from their
employer's plates, or joothan.
The Hindi word joothan, explains Mukherjee, 'literally means food left
on an eater's plate, usually destined for the garbage pail in a middle
class, urban home. However, such food would only be characterized
'joothan' if someone else besides the original eater were to eat it.
The word carries the connotations of ritual purity and pollution as
'jootha' means polluted.' Words like 'leftovers' and 'leavings' don't
substitute well, 'scraps' and 'slops' work better, though 'they are
associated more with pigs than with humans.' Joothan is also unfit for
consumption by anyone in the eater's family or in his own community.
Mukherjee writes:
The title encapsulates the pain, humiliation and poverty of Valmiki's
community, which not only had to rely on joothan but also relished it.
Valmiki gives a detailed description of collecting, preserving and
eating joothan. His memories of being assigned to guard the drying
joothan from crows and chickens, and of his relishing the dried and
reprocessed joothan burn him with renewed pain and humiliation in the
present.
The word actually carries a lot of historical baggage. Both Ambedkar
and Gandhi advised untouchables to stop accepting joothan. Ambedkar,
an indefatigable documenter of atrocities against Dalits [and an
'untouchable' himself], shows how the high caste villagers could not
tolerate the fact that Dalits did not want to accept their joothan
anymore and threatened them with violence if they refused it.
Valmiki describes one such incident, among the most powerful in the
text. His community looked forward to marriage feasts in the village
when they would gather outside with big baskets. After the guests had
eaten, 'the dirty pattals, or leaf plates, were put in the Chuhras'
baskets, which they took home, to save the joothan sticking to them.'
At the end of one such marriage feast, Valmiki's mother requested the
Brahmin host for additional food for her children, only to be
humiliated and told to mind her place, be satisfied with what she
already had collected, and to get going. Valmiki writes:
That night the Mother Goddess Durga entered my mother's eyes. It was
the first time I saw my mother so angry. She emptied the basket right
there. She said to Sukhdev Singh, 'Pick it up and put it inside your
house. Feed it to the baratis [marriage guests] tomorrow morning.' She
gathered me and my sister and left like an arrow. Sukhdev Singh had
pounced on her to hit her, but my mother had confronted him like a
lioness. Without being afraid.
His family fell on even harder times when his oldest brother and wage
earner got a high fever, and without access to a clinic, died. Valmiki
had finished fifth grade but their deepening poverty—they didn't even
have enough food—meant that he could not continue with school. He
dropped out and began tending buffaloes in the field, watching with a
heavy heart his schoolmates going to school. Over the protests of
others, his brother's widow pawned the only piece of jewelry she had,
a silver anklet, to pay for Valmiki's school—yet another close call.
Back in school, Valmiki continued to face severe discrimination.
Though he consistently did well in his studies, his memories of school
are suffused with pain and humiliation: from taunts and beatings by
schoolmates and teachers in a 'terror-filled environment', to his
exclusion from extracurricular activities like school plays; during
exams, he was not allowed to drink water from a glass when thirsty. He
had to cup his hands, and 'the peon would pour water from way high up,
lest our hands touch the glass.' At times, he writes, 'I feel I have
grown up in a cruel and barbaric civilization.' He does remember
fondly a couple of boys who befriended him and didn't let caste come
between them.
Remarkably enough, Valmiki was determined to make full use of the
school library; by the time he reached eighth grade, he had read
Saratchandra, Premchand, and Rabindranath Tagore, and relates this
poignant vignette.
I had begun to read novels and short stories to my mother in the faint
light of the wick lamp. Who knows how often Saratchandra's characters
have made a mother and son cry together? This was the beginning of my
literary sensibility. Starting from Alha, the Ramayana and the
Mahabharata to Sur Sagar, Prem Sagar, Premchand's stories, Kissa Tota
Maina … whatever I found, I, the son of an untouchable illiterate
family, read to my mother.
He studied in the light of a lantern in his intensely noisy
neighborhood. 'I was the first student of my caste,' writes Valmiki,
'not just from my basti but from all the surrounding villages of the
area, appearing for the high school exams,' and he felt the pressure
that came from their pride in him. His graduation became an occasion
for a feast in his community. He remembers that even one of the Tyagi
Brahmins came to his basti to offer congratulations, and later took
him home and fed him lunch in their own dishes while sitting next to
him. Valmiki's example inspired other children to show more interest
in education, and for a while he even ran evening classes in his
basti.
§
Unlike in the dominant Hindu tradition—which Valmiki pointedly
denigrates and wants no part of—widow remarriage was even in the 60s
an accepted norm in his community. He describes in some detail how
their gods were utterly different from Hindu gods and how different
their religious rituals were. [2] He also describes lots of family
drama and interpersonal politics in his community, not shying from
reproach where it is due, especially on their rank superstitions. He
writes about their jobs, suffering, and everyday struggle for dignity,
acknowledging that the women had an ever rawer deal than men.
Many Hindi writers and poets had written about the charms of village
life, observes Valmiki, but its 'real truth,' depicting the 'terrible
suffering of village life has not even been touched upon by the epic
poets of Hindi.' He also recounts other changes that were beginning to
take place. The young men of his community had begun to refuse to work
without wages. This soon escalated into an open confrontation with the
upper caste men who couldn't tolerate their nerve, and even got the
local police to beat them up. Valmiki calls this a turning point of
sorts; young men began departing from their basti to nearby towns and
cities.
Valmiki too left to pursue college education in the city of Dehradun,
where his brother and uncle worked. They all shared a single room in a
Bhangi basti. It was here that he encountered the works of Ambedkar,
which shook him up; he 'spent many days and nights in great turmoil.'
He grew more restless; his 'stone-like silence' began to melt, and 'an
anti-establishment consciousness became strong' in him. Ambedkar's
books, he writes, 'had given voice to my muteness,' and raised his
self-confidence. His rage grew sharper and he became more active in
college events, until his penury made him quit college and seek
technical training in an ordnance factory, with its promise of a shop
floor job that would judge him only for his work. But quitting college
made no dent whatsoever in his love of reading.
After a year of training, he got posted to the city of Jabalpur in
1968, moving in the ensuing years to Bombay and Chandrapur,
Maharashtra. The last third of his memoir is on this phase of his
life. Now he really came into his own: he met a bunch of Marxists,
read Chekov, Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Hemmingway, Zola, and other Western
writers. He joined a local theater group, saw Vijay Tendulkar's plays,
'read the entire works of Tagore and Kalidasa,' was drawn to the
Buddha's teachings, and discovered Marathi Dalit literature, the most
sophisticated in all of India, which energized him and forged his
literary consciousness. He began to publish poems and write a column
in a local weekly, later also plays and short stories. Almost two
decades later, he published Joothan. In its last two paragraphs, he
anticipates his critics:
Times have changed. But there is something somewhere that continues to
irk. I have asked many scholars to tell me why Savarnas [caste Hindus]
hate Dalits and Shudras so much? The Hindus who worship trees and
plants, beasts and birds, why are they so intolerant of Dalits? Today
caste remains a pre-eminent factor in social life. As long as people
don't know that you are a Dalit, things are fine. The moment they find
out your caste, everything changes. The whispers slash your veins like
knives. Poverty, illiteracy, broken lives, the pain of standing
outside the door, how would the civilized Savarna Hindus know it?
Why is my caste my only identity? Many friends hint at the loudness
and arrogance of my writings. They insinuate that I have imprisoned
myself in a narrow circle. They say that literary expression should be
focused on the universal; a writer ought not to limit himself to a
narrow, confined terrain of life. That is, my being Dalit and arriving
at a point of view according to my environment and my socioeconomic
situation is being arrogant. Because in their eyes, I am only an SC,
the one who stands outside the door.[3]
Valmiki's narrative voice brims with a quiet sense of outrage at what
he had to endure as a human. Indeed, I'm inclined to see his memoir as
a form of Satyagraha: in reflecting back to others their own violence
and injustice, it attempts to shame them into introspection. This is
the kind of book that becomes 'the axe for the frozen sea inside us.'
More Indians ought to read it and let its hard edges get to work
inside them.
***
(Also consider reading my companion piece, The Blight of Hindustan,
which provides a brisk overview of the Indian caste system—its
origins, spread, and some historical attitudes and debates.)
_____________________
Notes:
1. Arun Prabha Mukherjee notes that 'Valmiki places his and his Dalit
friends' encounters with upper caste teachers in the context of the
Brahmin teacher Dronacharya tricking his low caste disciple Eklavya
into cutting his thumb and presenting it to him as part of his
gurudakshina, or teacher's tribute. This is a famous incident in the
Mahabharata. By doing this, Dronacharya ensured that Eklavya, the
better student of archery, could never compete against Arjun, the
Kshtriya disciple. Indeed, having lost his thumb, Eklavya could no
longer perform archery. In high caste telling, the popular story
presents a casteless Eklavya as the exemplar of an obedient disciple
rather than the Brahmin Dronacharya as a perfidious and biased
teacher. When Valmiki's father goes to the school and calls the
headmaster a Dronacharya, he links the twentieth-century caste
relations to those that prevailed two thousand years ago.'
2. Kancha Ilaiah attempts a more systematic exposition on the
sociocultural differences between the caste Hindus and the Shudras and
Dalits in his trenchant book, 'Why I Am Not a Hindu'.
3. SC stands for Scheduled Caste, the neutral-sounding administrative
term for the lowest castes, including the 'untouchables'.
------------------------------------
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/
PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com
TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/
Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
