Monday, August 29, 2011

[ZESTCaste] The Lokpal debate from a Dalit-Bahujan perspective

The Lokpal debate from a Dalit-Bahujan perspective
August 27, 2011
tags: Anna Hazare, caste, Dalit-Bahujan, Dalits
by Shivam Vij

The video above shows a protest in Delhi demanding a Bahujan Lokpal
Bill, and protesting against Anna Hazare. This was hardly given any
coverage in the media. The video was made and uploaded by Khalid Anis
Ansari, who writes at the Round Table India:

A supra-parliamentary Jan Lokpal and a very interventionist and
unaccountable judiciary are a horror for the dalit-bahujan masses. All
said and done the legislature is most respectful of social diversity
as far as the three organs of government are concerned. The executive
is bad and the judiciary is the worst in this regard. So I am
presently in favor of taking the 'political' route than the civil
society one which is in any way a club of the chattering classes.
[Read the full post]

Given below is a note expressing a Dalit-Bahujan perspective on the
Lokpal debate. The note has been put out by DINESH MAURYA:

We want to submit some suggestions regarding the Government of
India's proposed Lokpal Bill. Like Anna's Lokpal Bill, our Lokpal
Bill, named as 'Bahujan Lokpal Bill', should also tabled in the
parliament and should be discussed in the same way as the other Bill.

We are demanding that following provisions should be taken into
consideration when making the Government's Bill:

1. Like the Public Sector (PSUs), private sector companies, NGOs,
Media groups should also be brought under the purview of Article 12 of
the Constitution as 'other authority', and also be brought under the
purview/jurisdiction of Lokpal.

2. Religious & Charitable Trusts, Maths, Mandirs, Waqf Boards,
Churches, Gurudwaras and other religious entities should also be
brought under the purview of the Lokpal Bill or a Religious Property
Acoountibility Bill, like the Judicial Accountibility Bill, should be

3. Representation for all communities -Dalits, Backward Classes,
Adivasis, Religious Minorities etc- should be ensured in the Lokpal
Selection Committee.

4. The selection of Lokpal should be debated in a Joint Session of
the parliament and there should be discussion regarding his/her
qualifications, conduct, character and reputation in public.

5. Representation for all communities- Dalits, Backward Classes,
Adivasis, Religious Minorities etc- should be ensured in the
constitution of members, in the Central/States' Lokpal Acts.

6. The minimum number of members of Lokpal should be not less than
14 and this office should come under the purview of reservations so
that all communities would be represented.

7. The Head of Lokayukt should be appointed on a rotational basis
so that every social group is represented.

8. The term of office of the Chairperson/Head should not be more
than 2 years.

9. If it is proved that any member of the Lokpal is politically
biased, he/she should be suspended immediately. But the process for
removal should be similar to that adopted in the case of Justice/s of

10. The power/office of the Lokayukt should be equal to the power
of a High Court.

11. The violation of or the non-implementation of the provision/s
for reservation and social justice should be treated as corruption and
for this the punishment should be same as that for corruption in an
economic sense.

12. The misuse of SC/ST/OBC funds should be treated as corruption
and for this the punishment should be same.

13. The definition of 'Corruption' should be expended and money
ammassed through cheating or fraud committed on illiterate citizens,
and in the name of faith should also be treated as Corruption.

14. The activity and conduct of Members of Parliament and Members
of Legislative Assemblies should not come under the jurisdiction of
the Lokpal.

15. The office and officers of Lokpal should come under the
jurisdiction of Right to Information Act.

16. The Lokpal and Lokayukt should be united through a Bill but
there should be equal respect for federal structure.

17. If there is conflict/contradiction between the provision of
Constitution of India and Lokpal, the provision of Constitution of
India should prevail.

18. The Lokpal Chairperson should be bound to disclose information
on his and his family's wealth and property and there should be an
audit of his wealth and property till after 10 years of end of his
term of office.

The concerns expressed in the note about sound reasonabe and important
to me and should be taken into account by both Team Manmohan and Team

A 'Save the Constitution' rally was held recently in Delhi to voice
the concerns of Dalit-Bahujans on the proposed Lokpal Bill

There was also a press conference at the Press Club of India
yesterday, addressed by various leaders of Dalit-Bhaujan and minority
communities, which was again barely give any space by the "national"
media. Given below is the text of the press release issued by them:

Now Civil Society of Dalits, Backwards and Minorities rise for their rights!

New Delhi, August 26, 2011

The Chairman of All India Confederation of SC/ST Organizations-
Dr. Udit Raj, Sr. IAS -P.S. Krishnan, Peace Party leader- Yusuf
Ansari, Urdu Sahara Editor -Aziz Burney, Social activists – Shabnam
Hashmi, Mast Ram Kapur, Dilip Mandal, All India Christian Council
leaders- John Dayal, Bishop MS Screakriaf and Madhu Chandra, President
of Shoshit Samaj Dal Akhilesh Katiyar, Sr. Advocate Subba Rao, Gen
Secy of IJP- C. P. Singh, Fmr Minister- Ibrahim Qureshi, Prof Vivek
Kumar, Grand son of Maulana Azad –Firoj Bakht Ahmed, Prof. Akhter
Mehandi and many other such personalities have decided to urge the
government to include the demands of Bahujan Lokpal Bill while passing
the Lokpal law. It was also discussed that in the Constitution, there
is a fine and delicate balance between legislature, executive and
judiciary and if anyone of these transgresses its power, that will
disturb the balance and resultantly the Constitution will be affected.

The Govt. Bill which is pending for consideration before the
Standing Committee of the Parliament is not strong enough to book the
corrupt. The way the govt. is considering the features of all three
bills – Govt. Bill, Jan Lokpal Bil and NCPRI Bill, the suggestions of
Bahujan Lokpal Bill also be considered. We are of the strong opinion
that unless Corporate Houses, NGOs and Media are included in the ambit
of the Bill, there will not be much impact to check graft. In the
Lokpal Committee, the representation of Dalits, Backwards and
Minorities should be there, as it is in the govt. services. These
communities are apprehensive that if this committee is constituted
without giving them due consideration, it is more likely that dalits,
backwards and minorities' officers and leaders will be targeted on
pick and choose basis. Our society is not only caste ridden but at the
same time it is multicultural and religious also. So the
representation of each major community should be taken care of. The
corruption is more social in nature than political, therefore ,
without addressing it, there is no possibility to weed it out. On 24th
August, we organized a mammoth rally for our demands and unlike the
news of Anna Hazare, not a single electronic channel has telecast it.
Isn't this mental corruption? The presence of participants in Anna
Hazare's movement is not only exaggerated but telecast continuously.
There is plurality and diversity in the society and so our views
should have been also shown. In these circumstances, we demand
representation of these communities in the structure of Lokpal
Committee. There are many schemes for the upliftment of these
communities but due to rampant corruption, fruits are not reaching to
them and therefore, the Bahujan Lokpal Bill urges the govt. to
consider this also. Violation of reservation should be also treated as
an act of corruption.

Dr. Udit Raj said that there are misgivings that the Rally of 24th
August was against Anna Hazare agitation but that is not true. In so
far as corruption is concerned, we are also strongly opposed to it.
From our rally it was asked to the craftsmen of Janlokpal Bill why did
they not include Corporate Houses, Media and NGOs? Anna ji was asked
why he kept silent when North Indians in Maharashtra and Muslims in
Gujarat were targeted and brutalized? He was also asked to express his
views on reservation for dalits. If his civil society leaders are not
trusting the representatives who are elected by lacks of people then
how the honesty and impartiality of Lokpal can be guaranteed ? No
doubt there is too much corruption in politics but it is more by the
blessings of Corporate Houses. At least, there are checks on peoples'
representatives and that is seeking the mandate of people again and
again but those deterrents are not there in case of Lokpal. We have
asked for an appointment with the Prime Minister and Standing
Committee of Parliament to submit our Bill and so far that has not
been communicated. The Govt. is not treating us at par with Anna
Hazare Civil Society and this is proved by the fact that so far we
have not been consulted and nothing communicated to us.

And given below is a meorandum submitted to the Rajya Sabha by the
"Savidhan Bachao Andolan":

Shri K P Singh,
Rajya Sabha Secretariat
201, Second Floor,
Parliament House Annexe,
New Delhi – 110 001



This is in reference to the Newpaper advertisement No davp
31202/11/0019/1112, where in Parliamentary Standing Committee on
Personnel, Public Grievance, Law and Justice have invited views and
opinions on the Lokpal Bill that is posted on the website of Rajya
Sabha. I have read the bill in detail and my views and suggestions are
as follows:

(1) The heart of the Lokpal bill is to constitute a mechanism for
dealing with complaints of corruption against public functionaries in
higher places. However there are many instances of corruption by
functionaries in the corporate sector which had duped the public in
the past. To cite a few examples – Harshad Mehta scam, Satyam, Telgi,
Citibank scams and school admission donations. At the moment,
accountability is disproportionately inclined towards public
functionaries in comparison to corporate. Also the Right to
Information Act 2005 is not applicable in corporate or private
institutions. Hence it is suggested to include corporate and private
functionaries within the ambit of Lokpal Bill.

(2) As per the clause 17 (f) of the Lokpal Bill, the jurisdiction
of inquiry of Lokpal extends to the societies or associations or trust
that are wholly or partially funded or aided by the Government. While
this is a welcome move, the media is completely left out from the
ambit of the Lokpal Bill. 'Paid news' and 'Paid opinion polls' that
influence the public opinion is a bad precedent. Hence it is suggested
that media be brought under the ambit of Lokpal as it the fourth
pillar of democracy.

(3) As per the clause 17 (f) of the Lokpal Bill, the jurisdiction
of inquiry of Lokpal does not extend to societies or associations or
trust that are constituted for religious purposes. Large numbers of
people donate money in religious institutions which is managed by
these societies or associations or trust. Sadly, some of these
societies or associations or trusts have become safe havens of black
money which some people dispose off in the name of donation. The
societies or associations or trust have become richer day by day at
the cost of loss to the Government exchequer. Take the most recent
example of Sai Baba Trust where unaccounted crores of rupees and other
wealth were found after Sai Baba's death. And the trust itself is
worth Rupees 1.4 lakh crores as per media reports, which is 50 times
the annual budget of Government of India's flag ship program – Sarva
Siksha Abhyiyan. On top of that, majority (80 percentages) of the
population in India are Hindus, who worship in Hindu temples. However
many of these Hindu temples are controlled by the Brahmins, as is
their birth right, as prescribed by the Hindu religious scriptures.
Also the bylaws of these societies or associations or trust are
formulated in such discriminatory way that they directly or indirectly
exclude non Brahmi sections from their management. Isn't it strange
that Brahmins are entirely excluded from accountability to the public?
Hence it is suggested to include in the ambit of Lokpal such societies
or associations or trust that are constituted for religious purposes.

(4) The clause 4 (1) of the Lokpal Bill lists the members of
selection committee to recommend appointment of Lokpal. The selection
committee does not have representation from disadvantaged sections of
the society viz – women, SC, ST and minorities to safe guard their
interest. Hence it is suggested to include (a) Chairperson of National
Women's Commission, (b) Chairperson of SC / ST Commission and (c)
Chairperson of National Commission of Minorities in the Selection

(5) The clause 2 (b) of the Lokpal Bill specifies that the Members
of the Lokpal should not exceed eight of whom fifty percent shall be
judicial member. There is no mention of inclusion of members from
disadvantaged sections of the society viz – women, SC, ST and
minorities communities as members in the Lokpal. The representation
needs to be in terms of proportions in the population and
recommendations made by various commissions from time to time. Hence
it is suggested that apart from fifty percent judicial representation
to include fifty percent representation for women, twenty five percent
representation from SC / ST and twenty percent for minorities in the

(6) The clause 49 (1) of the Lokpal bill deals with offenses and
penalties when a false and frivolous or vexatious complaint is made
under the Act (Lokpal). Sometimes, it is seen that such a false and
frivolous or vexatious complaint is knowingly made against an SC / ST
functionary for harassment due to the prevailing societal prejudice.
Hence it is suggested that if such a false and frivolous or vexatious
complaint is made against and SC / ST functionaries then the relevant
clauses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities Act), 1989 also need to be invoked and needs mention in the
Lokpal Bill. These clauses from the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989 could be clauses 3.1 (ix),
3.2 (i), 3.2 (ii), 3.2. (vi) and 7.

(7) I have my full concurrence to all the clauses and sub-sections
in the Lokpal Bill 2011 other than that mentioned above for
suggestions to improve upon.

(8) The suggested additions other than the clauses and
sub-sections in the Lokpal Bill 2011 are as follows:

a. It is observed that many a times the common man is connected
with lower level of public functionaries and suffers due to indulgency
in corrupt practices by any functionary. Hence it is suggested to
include the lower level of public and private functionaries in the
Lokpal Bill as well.

b. There needs to be a mechanism in which common man can blow the
whistle and indicate corruption. Hence a website to register
complaints and a common telephone number needs to be provisioned for
this purpose as a via media for the common man to indicate possible
corruption. Necessary clauses need to be included for the protection
of rights of such whistle blower.

c. There have been instances in the past where funds allocated for
the SC / ST subplan from the Government of India have been misused /
diverted for the use that have not benefitted these disadvantaged
communities. Take an instance of diversion of funds from SC / ST
subplan to the Common Wealth Funds. This is against the Planning
Commission guidelines. Hence it is suggested that diversions of funds
from the SC / ST subplan should come automatically under the preview
of Lokpal and the treated as offence under the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989. If required
then necessary amendments need to made under the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989.

d. It has been observed that there are numerous cash flows during
the election time. The marginalized communities viz: women, SC, ST and
minorities that are the most disadvantaged and have less cash stands
deprived. Hence it is recommended that election expenses also be
brought under the ambit of the Lokpal Bill.

I am of the view that the Lokpal should not be above the Judiciary
and the Prime Minister and a separate mechanism similar to the
Election Commission needs to be constituted in the country. I trust
that there will be a favorable response to my proposition.

Yours sincerely
All Members
"Savidhan Bachao Andolan"


Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at

On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia:! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive