October 2, 2011
In my childhood, way back in the early Sixties, there was a Gandhi
statue in my village.
His clean shaved head and semi-naked body with a tucked-in dhoti, in a
walking posture, resembled my illiterate shepherd father in every
respect except for the classic stick in the right hand, a book in the
left hand and round spectacle frames.
The village norm was that everyone could touch the Gandhi statue,
except the Madigas (dalits). We used to call him Gandhi 'thaathaa'
One hundred and forty two years after his birth and 63 years after his
death, has the relationship between Mahatma Gandhi the historical
figure, the India that he represented, and the poor masses who earn
just Rs 32 per day in urban India and Rs 26 in rural India, in other
words, the dalits, changed?
The majority of educated dalits do not accept the epithet 'the father
of the nation' for Gandhi. Instead, they address Bhimrao Ramji
Ambedkar as the "father of the nation". Is that because we live in two
different nations: India and Bharat?
Quite interestingly, Anna Hazare describes himself as a Gandhian and
hung Gandhi's portrait behind his anti-corruption fasting 'public
bed'. At the other extreme was Narendra Modi who too hung Gandhi's
portrait behind his 'sadbhavna seat' of power.
Vande Mataram was the rousing chant at the gatherings of both Mr
Hazare and Mr Modi. Obviously, both of them seem to be promising
'Young India' (incidentally, also the name of Gandhi's journal in
which he formulated his core philosophy) that they would bring about
Gandhi's Ram Rajya.
For many nationalists, the Gandhian Ram Rajya is yet to come (like the
Kingdom of God of Jews). This is a society where there is no
corruption and where the classical Varnadharma, without reservations,
would operate, of course with the right to compete with one another,
just as Gandhi had visualised after 'Hind Swaraj' was realised. Thus,
for the upper castes and the rich, swaraj has come, but the Ram Rajya
of Gandhi is yet to come.
Ambedkar located the roots of untouchability, oppression and
horrendous poverty in that same Ram Rajya and according to many dalit
writers the poor and oppressed are still living in Ram Rajya, which
has been in existence for centuries. They are waiting for Buddha
Rajya, as Ambedkar had visualised it.
For the majority at the bottom there is no raj, leave alone swaraj.
They still live in a Hobbesian 'state of nature' where restrictions
are imposed upon individuals that curtail their natural rights, or, to
use Kautilya's phrase, in Matsyanyaya, where, in periods of chaos the
strong devour the weak, just as in periods of drought big fish eat
For the liberal, globalised intellectual of India, Gandhi is the
solution to all problems. However, in village India he is a faint
memory, with dilapidated statues here and there, and a customary
lesson in some school textbooks.
Like Nehru, Gandhi was a Congress man, but he transcended party lines
and became a globally respectable moral force. For world leaders, from
Martin Luther King to Nelson Mandela to Barack Obama, Gandhi is the
moral force of non-violence.
Among the elite group of global moral forces he has outgrown his own
heroes — Leo Tolstoy and Henry David Thoreau among others. In informed
circles around the world, he is the most known and revered Indian
after Buddha. They do not see him as a politician, nor do they see him
as a spiritual guru. To some he is a self-suffering sexual
experimentalist, to others he is a complicated character of David
At home, anyone, from Mr Hazare to Mr Modi, can use his portrait to
empower the middle class or to embolden the Hindutva brigade. Nehru
cannot escape his party's boundaries, though the historical Ambedkar
competes with the historical Gandhi of the Hindu ethos when it comes
to being a force of moral philosophy and social justice.
In fact, within India in many realms Ambedkar is outshining Gandhi.
Don't be surprised if Mr Modi's prime ministerial rath carries
portraits of both Gandhi and Ambedkar, or just of Ambedkar. The RSS,
remember, doesn't recognise Gandhi as a nationalist, but it calls
Ambedkar a nationalist.
Ambedkar saw Gandhi as an enemy of the dalits. When Gandhi represented
India in the Second Round Table Conference, Ambedkar said,
"Unfortunately, the Congress chose Mr Gandhi as its representative. A
worse person could not have been chosen to guide India's destiny."
Gandhi did not prove him wrong when he said, "The Congress has from
its very commencement taken up the cause of the so-called
'untouchables'". He saw untouchability in 1931 as "so-called", not
real, and the untouchables as people who deserve to be referred to in
quotes. Ambedkar understood the diabolism of Gandhian linguistic
engagement with dalits.
Gandhi called them Harijans but did not ask for their right to engage
with Hari as priests. He was willing to grant them the right to touch
others and the right to be touched, but he was not willing to go
beyond that. He claimed that he represented entire India, with the
occasional exception of Muslims and Sikhs. He treated Indians as
Hindus and saw himself as the incontestable representative of all
Hindus — including dalits.
Ambedkar, on the other hand, saw Hindus as collective suppressors of
dalits, hence wanted protection for them from 'the tyranny and
oppression of the Hindus', even from the oppression of present-day
In this land of Buddha, Gandhi and Ambedkar, the 21st century has
created a moral and ethical crisis with huge economic and social
disparities, though most of them are inherited from the past. The
Ambanis, the Gujarati baniyas at that, do not have an iota of respect
for Gandhi's austerity — frugal food and ashram housing.
The costliest family house in the world is built by a baniya from
Gandhi's state and caste. The global poorest of the poor, mostly
dalits, live in this land of Gandhi on less than Rs 26 per day.
Gandhi undertook the longest hunger strike against the principle of
separate electorate for dalits, resulting in the Poona Pact. Ambedkar,
on the other hand, characterises all such hunger strikes as
instruments of blackmail to derail democratic negotiations and
institutionalisation of pro-poor laws.
As the Hindu God promises in the Gita, 'Sambhavami yuge yuge' (I will
come back millennium after millennium), Gandhian hunger protests are
coming to the fore again and again in the nation. Gandhi's method of
protest as used by today's protesters is proving difficult for
present-day rulers. But rural India doesn't know how to make sense of
Gandhi. For many illiterate villagers he is the thaathaa of tamashas.
The writer is director, Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion and
Inclusive Policy, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMediafirstname.lastname@example.org, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to email@example.com
TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCastefirstname.lastname@example.org OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/
Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: