Sunday, January 22, 2012

[ZESTCaste] "Difficult, yet accommodating ties between Gandhiji and Ambedkar"

Jaipur, January 21, 2012
"Difficult, yet accommodating ties between Gandhiji and Ambedkar"
Mohammed Iqbal

A panel discussion at the Jaipur Literature Festival on Saturday on
the legacies and forms of mass mobilisation adopted by Mahatma Gandhi
and B.R. Ambedkar during the freedom movement threw a new light on the
"difficult, yet accommodating" relationship between the two leaders
described in different manners by different historians. Speakers also
defined the notion of trusteeship from the perspective of rights in
modern democracy.

Historian Sunil Khilnani, social activist Aruna Roy, journalist M.J.
Akbar and authors Joseph Lelyveld and S. Anand addressed the session
on "Gandhi, Ambedkar and the crossroads at Jantar Mantar" moderated by
feminist Urvashi Butalia.

The discussion centred on the relevance of protest methods of Gandhiji
and Dr. Ambedkar in the contemporary politics with activists like Anna
Hazare being compared to Gandhiji in his fight against corruption.
Jantar Mantar in New Delhi has been used of late as a rallying point
for hunger fasts and mass gatherings.

Speakers said while Gandhiji had used non-violent protests to appeal
to the "sense of morality" of the oppressor, Dr. Ambedkar believed
more in taking recourse to law for fighting oppression against Dalits.
There were some points of convergence between the two great leaders
after the signing of the Poona Pact at Yerawada Jail in 1932.

While Gandhiji made all-out efforts to eradicate untouchability in the
Hindu society, he had to balance several causes he was pursuing during
the freedom struggle. In contrast, Dr. Ambedkar had a single cause for
devoting his entire energy, said Pulitzer Prize winner Joseph

Mr. Lelyveld, author of Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle
with India released in 2011, said there were several months of
cohesion between Dr. Ambedkar and Gandhiji after the Poona Pact, but
the latter was rather dissatisfied towards the end by the way
Independence was achieved for the country.

"Gandhiji's own experiments did not often work out to his own
satisfaction. In his view, his initiatives for Hindu-Muslim amity,
abolition of untouchability and establishment of a just social order
did not quite work brilliantly," said Mr. Lelyveld, whose book has
been banned in Mahatma Gandhi's home State Gujarat.

"I am a survivor of a fatwa from the great Gandhian Chief Minister of
Gujarat who banned my book," said the celebrated author, taking a dig
at Narendra Modi.

Ms. Aruna Roy said septuagenarian activist Anna Hazare's
anti-corruption campaign was not inclusive in character because it
ostracised Dalits, and the people who joined it had little sympathy
for the similar ongoing struggles, such as Irom Sharmila's indefinite
fast against the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in Manipur.

"In fact, the middle class of Indians who joined Anna Hazare's drive
wants unfettered powers to the security forces and military rule in
Jammu and Kashmir and in northeastern States. Inconsistencies are
[inherent] in such a movement," said Ms. Roy, who had dissociated
herself with Mr. Hazare's core team following differences over the
Lokpal Bill draft.

The Magsaysay Award winner said the concept of trusteeship popular
during the freedom struggle had been replaced by "social contract" in
modern democracy with the citizens expecting certain rights from the
State. When public ethics were not complied with, civil rights
movements take shape, she added.

Mr. Akbar said Gandhiji had understood the power of "silent cruelty"
when he adopted the end of discrimination against Dalits as the focal
point of his social movement. With an identical significance, Dr.
Ambedkar should be credited for adoption of the Hindu Code Bill just
after Independence, which brought a great social reform in the Hindu

Mr. Anand said that despite the largest-ever conversion into Buddhism
in 1956, Dalits had rarely launched a movement against the state since
Independence and had reserved their rage for the so-called higher
castes. This approach, he felt, had genesis in Dr. Ambedkar taking a
legalistic view in most of the Dalit issues.

Confidence in law

Mr. Khilnani said Dr. Ambedkar had put a greater confidence in the
impartiality of law than Gandhiji, who devised most of his protests in
a way that embarrassed the British and compelled them to act
differently. "The notion of political representation [also] got
different shapes among the followers of the two leaders."


Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at

On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia:! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive