Dear Gail, You have said all that I would have liked to say, but in a much better way. In particular, Martin Nicolaus's thinking: "we need to study the ruling classes for the sake of the working class!" is very enlightening. The truth behind their supposed effort to achieve a casteless society by "being blind to caste" is that the ruling class wants to hide how much of power is concentrated in the hands of 3% Brahmins and 10-15% upper caste. In the deceit of the conservative upper caste individuals the supposed liberals are no less complicit in the name of their longing for a casteless society. In response to "race problem" in the The truth is that among the upper caste individuals the conservative ones are always going to feel proud of their caste lineage and proudly pronounce the same at the earliest occasion. For the lower castes, hiding their castes would be psychologically damaging for them, hence they should pronounce their caste whenever occasion arises for the same. The liberal minded upper caste to should also declare their caste, lest others may feel that s/he is hiding his or her caste to ingratiate himself or herself among the lower caste groups. In other words, hiding caste is not good for anyone, even for those who do not believe in it and wish caste system were never invented. In view of the above and other facts of life it is not only pointless and futile but detrimental to strive for a casteless society. What we need to strive for is when caste labels and caste-indicative last names mean no more than what Smith, Blacksmith, Goldsmith, Fisher, Shhoemacher, etc. mean for the Western society – hardly any significance is attached to these last names. However, to reach that stage wherein caste or caste-indicative last names do not have any significance, these castes will have to be statistically equalized in the socio-political- Take a look at what a couple of Swiss authors say in the attached paper called "Power Sharing in At this point allow me to mention here that Switzerland appears to be the best example of multi-cultural society living in peace and amity, rather than the USA, which only grudgingly accepted affirmative action (which is nothing but a loose form of quota or reservation system) during the Civil Rights movement, which was eventually rejected by its conservative Supreme Court but then brought back for practical reasons in a further weakened form of reservation, rechristened as Diversity! Of course the Swiss did not have to face the difficulties presented by racial prejudices in arriving at their equitable and fair power sharing institutions and culture – they only had to overcome linguistic prejudices. I am also attaching a longer article on "Women's Reservation" for your perusal and critical analysis. Best regards, Satinath
|
Attachment(s) from Satinath Choudhary
2 of 2 File(s)
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/
PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com
TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/
Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/