Sunday, June 27, 2010

[ZESTCaste] Class is the issue

http://www.hindu.com/mag/2010/06/27/stories/2010062750140400.htm

Viewpoint

Class is the issue

HARI NARKE

The OBC census is not a caste census and one that is necessary to
formulate policies vital to their development.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBCs are not a caste but a socially and educationally backward class.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While the demand for census of Other Backward Classes (OBC) is being
criticised for promoting casteism, it was the Planning Commission's
report on the Eleventh Five-year Plan ( Vol 1, pg 118, 120, 2008)
which stressed the need for such a census. "Like SCs, STs, Minorities
and persons with disabilities, there is an imperative need to carry
out a census of OBCs now or in the next census in 2011. In the absence
of exact assessment of their population size, literacy rate,
employment status in government, private and unorganised sectors,
basic civic amenities, health status, poverty status and human
development and HPIs, it is very difficult to formulate realistic
policies and programmes for the development of OBCs."

The Commission said that "State-wise, OBC-wise data on populations as
well as vital and demographic variables are not available, which is
the main hurdle in the formulation of policies and programmes for the
development of the Other Backward Classes."

Before this, the Standing Committee on Social Justice, 2006, headed by
Sumitra Mahajan and comprising 28 MPs, "strongly recommend that
Ministry should vigorously pursue with the Registrar General of India
to conduct a survey of OBCs and the persons living below double the
poverty line in this category so that the Ministry could prepare its
Action Plan so that the required amount of funds can be made available
to the State Governments for effective implementation of National
Backward Classes Finance Development Corporations various schemes for
the development of backward classes". In addition , the three Backward
Classes Commissions in 1955, 1980 and 2004-05, apart from the National
Commission for Nomadic Tribes, Semi Nomadic Tribes & Denotified Tribes
[Renke Commission], 2008, was in favour of an OBC census.

Crucial distinction


A major issue that needs to be clarified here is that the OBC census
is a class census and not a caste census. It has to be pointed out
that OBCs are not a caste but a socially and educationally backward
class. Just as there is a special provision in the budget of the
states and the Centre for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(SC/ST), the OBCs also need a separate budget for their upliftment.
They have a constitutional right to basic amenities, employment, and
shelter and unless we know their exact population, it will be
difficult to make plans for them. The OBC census is required for two
reasons. While budgeting and planning for the OBCs is one aspect, the
other crucial one is to silence the repeated attack, in numerous writ
petitions, against reservation for OBCs on the grounds that their
exact population is not known. The Supreme Court has on every occasion
rejected this argument but it will pop up again and again. There is a
misconception that SCs and STs are Constitutionally recognised
categories but OBCs are not. This is not true. The Constitutional
recognition of SCs and STs are articles 341 and 342 and for OBCs it is
article 340. Only, there was gross delay in implementing article 340
at the central level till as late as 1990, though lists of OBCs were
made in the peninsular provinces and princely states even before
Independence. The total number of OBCs for all states in the central
list is only 1963, not a formidable number compared to SCs and STs.

There has been a religion-wise census for 140 years. India was divided
because of religion, not because of caste, but the religion-wise
census continues. There is a census of SC/ST without any objection. If
SC/ST census is not opposed, why then is a classwise census of more
than 52 per cent of the population being opposed? Even today, there is
endogamy in this country. All castes have their organisations. Those
organisations hold their conventions, they have their own banks,
educational institutes etc but no one complains against them.

Those who say that casteism will spread due to the OBC census forget
that the caste system has been in existence for thousands of years and
continues regardless of any Census. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar himself had
insisted on an OBC census along with separate SC/ST census in
independent India. This has been categorically mentioned in his book
Who Were The Shudras?There were serious debates in the Constituent
Assembly on this issue. Dr. Ambedkar played a seminal role for the
rights of OBCs. Jyotiba Phule and Dr. Ambedkar have given the
blueprint for caste annihilation in this country. Social justice to
all, equality and adequate representation in the power structure are
prerequisites in a casteless society. There is no shortcut. To
recognise the rights of a large percentage of people, they have to be
counted first.

Strong provisions


One doubt is raised that people may furnish false information. If they
do this, there is stringent punishment in 1948 census act of up to Rs.
1,000 fine and three years imprisonment. This provision is
deliberately ignored by the opponents of the OBC census. The Akhil
Bharatiya Mahatma Phule Samata Parishad, headed by Maharashtra Deputy
Chief Minister Chhagan Bhujbal had demanded an independent census of
OBCs in the presence of the President of India Dr. Shankar Dayal
Sharma in a national convention on December 12, 1993 at Pune. The
Samata Parishad has also filed a PIL in the Supreme Court seeking
justice for this demand in February 2010 and the Union Government has
been ordered to submit an affidavit in this regard by Supreme Court.
Our demand is not to mention caste or sub-caste but the class only.
Since the census is being carried out by the central government, there
is no possibility of any conflict over the list prepared by National
Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).

The question then boils down to who should conduct the OBC census. The
Census organisation says that it cannot take on the additional burden
and wants it to be left to state Backward Class commissions. These
commissions and the NCBC are far behind the census organisation in
infrastructure and capability. It is only the central Census
organisation that can undertake this. It should be strengthened to the
extent necessary for this vital task.

Hari Narke is Professor and Head, Mahatma Phule Chair, University of
Pune and a member of the State Commission for Backward Classes,
Maharashtra.


------------------------------------

----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments:

Post a Comment