Tuesday, September 28, 2010

[ZESTCaste] Nation wide story on the new forms of caste discrimination and untouchability / atrocities,

 

Nation wide story on the new forms of caste discrimination and untouchability / atrocities

Dear Brothers and sisters

Jaibheem

A print media journalist making a nation wide story on the new forms of caste discrimination and untouchability / atrocities, that are emerging in the urban dalit life, in the places of employment , education and residence.

As the forms of discrimination / atrocities changing and they are becoming invisible and not defined under SC ST POA

Please share your experiences and opinions; please write to me on navayan@gmail.com.  Names will not be published

Please talk to me for further information on: 09346677007

Regards

Karthik Navayan


--
B.Karthik Navayan, Advocate
H.No. 21-7-761,
Opp.High Court Post Office,
Gansi Bazar, Hyderabad,
PIN-500002, AP.
Cell:09346677007,
email:navayan@gmail.com
http://karthiknavayan.wordpress.com/
http://www.petitiononline.com/93466770/petition.html
http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Profile.aspx?uid=10379805095932756525

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

[ZESTCaste] Brahmins were not rich people in the pre-colonial India.

 

 
by Farida Majid

Brahmins were not rich people in the pre-colonial India.  That is how the caste system was meant to work.

Money handlers were the Banya, the traders, the Saodagors, the shopkeepers, etc.  The workers were the wealth producers, and though they were the lower castes, Brahmins had no power to snatch the fruit of their labor because the priestly caste was restricted from doing that by strict Shastriya laws.

Hindu kings and princes were of Kshatriya caste. Even the rich temple managers, those who were at the gate, receiving money, alms and gifts from the devotees, were surprisingly non-Brahmans.  

Brahmins and economy were kept as far away from each other as possible. Brahmins were to lead an austere life, be devoted scholars, and do priestly duties for the community.Brahmins were strictly prohibited from engaging in commerce.

There were, of course, thieves and thugs among Brahmins.  When caught thieving Brahmins were to be punished 16 times the punishment that a shudra would normally receive for the same crime. For certain crimes, such as stealing food stuffs like a juicy cuke from the vine of someone else's garden, a Brahmin would be punished less than a shudra, or not punished at all based on the logic that the poor Brahmin had no means of livelihood other than begging or what he received as fee for his priestly duties.

It is the British who invented in their fertile 19th century imagination (curiously, not before their colonial intentions of gobbling rich India) the unreal formula of upper caste equals upper class.  

In Mughal India the potters, weavers, fishermen, washermen, dairy men, and even ordinary
farmers were economically better off than a poor Brahmin.

The British not only looted our wealth, but did something no other looter of India did. They
destroyed our wealth-producing economic system, and then institutionalized the caste
system as an empty shell of social oppression.

Mohandas K. Gandhi was of a Banya caste.  He was not a Brahmin and hence had no
firsthand knowledge of Sanskrit and the Shastra or the Hindu jurisprudence. He had no authority to make pronouncements on whether or not caste system could be abolished, or that it was "an integral part of Hinduism."  Had he been a learned Brahmin with some command of Shastra and the laws, he could have and should have boldly opted for abolishing the caste system seeing that it served no useful economic purpose any longer.

A generation before Gandhi there were learned Brahmins, and I know of one, who
strongly proposed the abolition of the caste system.  But I doubt the British would let go of an
instrument to beat the poor with, one that they could innocently claim not to have "invented."


Farida Majid

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

[ZESTCaste] Yeddy stresses for speedy disposal of atrocity cases

 

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/100049/yeddy-stresses-speedy-disposal-atrocity.html

Yeddy stresses for speedy disposal of atrocity cases
Bangalore,Sept 27 (PTI):

Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa today directed the officials
attached to Civil Rights Enforcement (CRE) Cell to ensure speedy
disposal of cases of atrocities committed on dalits and promised to
set up more special courts to try such cases.

There are instances of witnesses turning hostile as with delay in
cases and guilty going scotfree, a trend which needs to be put an end
to, Yeddyurappa told reporters after chairing the meeting of state
level committee on prevention of atrocities on SCs and STs set up
under his chairmanship.

The meeting, which was to be held at least twice a year to review
atrocity cases and the progress of investigation made by CRE Cell met
today for the first time after the BJP government came to power.

Yeddyurappa, admitting the delay in convening the Committee meeting,
said he would hereafter hold the sittings once in six months. He said
currently the state has seven special courts to try cases of
atrocities on SCs and STs and if need arises, the government was
willing to establish more courts.
Yeddyurappa also directed officials to take stringent action against
those who commit atrocities on dalits.

As many as 632 cases of attrocities on these sections have been
registered and 373 are still pending for disposal, he pointed out.
Efforts should be made to check the menace of non-dalits securing fake
caste certificates to deny reservation benefits to dalits, he said.
Yeddyurappa said allocation for SCs welfare which was Rs 107 crore in
2005-06 has touched Rs 403 crore in 2010-11. For STs the allocation
has witnessed ten fold hike in 2010-11 touching Rs 1344 crore as
against a meagre Rs 133 crore earmarked in 2005-06,he said.

Similarly allocation for Ambedkar Development Corporation which
provides financial assistance to SCs and STs for various
self-employment proramms has increased to Rs 1405 crore in 2010-11
from Rs 530 crore in 2005-06.
Ministers representing SCs and STs like Govind Karjol, C
Narayanaswamy, Balachandra Jarkiholi, Shivaraj Tangadagi, P M
Narendraswamy attended the meeiting.
Home Minister R Ashok was also present.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
MARKETPLACE

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

[ZESTCaste] The Stink Of Savanur (Anand Teltumbde)

http://www.countercurrents.org/teltumbde270910.htm

The Stink Of Savanur

By Anand Teltumbde

27 September, 2010
Countercurrents.org

On 20 July 2010, some manual scavengers of Savanur, a small town in
Haveri district of north Karnataka performed a novel act in protest
against their helplessness. They smeared themselves with human excreta
in public before the municipal council office. The stink of it
strangely attracted many, including Pramod Muthalik of the notorious
Sriram Sene, the militant Hindutva outfit to the Bhangi Colony and
thrown up numerous issues of consequence.

The Shame of India

India that prides on being one of the high growth economies and
emerging super power has many persistent shames. Certainly, the manual
scavenging, a euphemism for some people carrying shit of others for
living is the topmost. India enacted a special act, as it usually
does, way back in 1993, the Employment of Manual Scavengers and
Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act providing for
imprisonment up to one year and a fine of Rs. 2,000 or both to those
practicing it. Actually, it well constituted a crime under the
existing but much dreaded Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The only impact these Acts had
was to send the authorities into denial mode while huge funds were
being consumed with the shifting target to end the obnoxious practice.
Recently, the Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment Mukul Wasnik
admitted in the Rajya Sabha that manual scavenging should have been
eradicated two years ago, but now the target had been fixed for March
2010. Well, the government may have sung self congratulatory requiem
to this top shame on 1 April, making fool of people. But soon after
three months, Savanur stink again exposed the lie and brought the
issue to the fore.

The Savanur Protest

The issue was simple, so at least the people in Municipal Council of
Savnur thought and ignored it. But it spelt virtual death to Dalits.
They were suddenly asked by the Municipal Council to evict the land
they lived on for generations just to construct a commercial complex
there. The orders in terms of law were illegal but who would contest
the authorities. The Dalits kept on pleading but their plea fell on
deaf years. On the contrary, to pressure them the Municipal
authorities cut off their water connection. Poor Dalits who belonged
to the Bhangi sub caste, would be forbidden to take water from any
other source because of their untouchability. Buying it was out of
question as they barely subsided on a pittance thrown to them for
cleaning dry latrines. What may appear simple to others was thus a
death knell for them, which drove them to the desperate act of daubing
themselves with human excreta. The sensational act attracted media and
thereby swarms of politicians. The ministers came, held meetings,
issued orders and at least temporarily saved the Bhangis from
devastation. As it happens, the action taken may prove to be mere wash
up as suspected by the PUCL (Karnataka) fact finding (preliminary)
report on the incident. (http://www.puclkarnataka.org)

Hypocrisy, Thy Name India

Although the method of this protest was novel, there was nothing
unusual about it. The people who did it, only showed their routine
predicament to the public, which just pretended not to notice. When it
comes to Dalits, the Indian State as well as civil society always
recoils into a denial mode. The hypocritical attitude of the
government is best exposed in the international forums where it
vehemently opposes caste even being discussed. India always
enthusiastically showed up as fighter against racism, colonialism and
apartheid being observed elsewhere but when the UN Conference at
Durban sought to include caste in its agenda, the government
spiritedly opposed it with indefensible alibi like caste is not race
or it is its internal matter, or worse, there is no caste
discrimination in India. While caste may not be race in technical
terms but as the descent based discrimination, there is no functional
difference between the two, which is what the Durban conference
contended. Indian elite in its cocoon always tend to believe that
caste is a thing of past. The hypocrisy no where gets better exposed
than in the case of manual scavenging. While it enacted the law
against it in 1993, most states had not adopted it until 2003 saying
that they did not have any manual scavengers. With all flip-flops in
face of the contrary evidence brought up by various surveys, which
still maintain that the number of manual scavengers are well over 1.3
million, the government is about to declare the issue as dead.

Even Shit Gathers Vultures

The swiftness with which the authorities acted puzzled many. Within 24
hours the Irrigation Minister Basavarj Bommai, who happens to be local
legislator held a special meeting in Savanur to discuss the issue,
which decided among others not to evict the 13 Bhangi families from
the present place till alternative arrangements are made; to allot
them Ashraya plots; to provide basic amenities with immediate effect
and to provide them employment as sweepers under contractor. For the
next couple of days there was a continuous flow of politicians to the
Bhangi colony which culminated in the visit of Pramod Muthalik himself
closeting with Bhangis. The mystery lay in the demographic composition
of Savanur which has about 60 percent Muslim population and its
Municipal Council having predominance of the Congress, commanding 15
members out of total 23, leaving just three for the BJP. Karnataka is
a happening place under the present Sangh Parivar dispensation. There
is a campaign of sorts to lure Dalits into the Hindutva fold in the
communal divide being engineered in the State. Recently, the Pejawar
swamy Vishwesha Teertha from the Hindutva camp toured the Dalit colony
in Mysore and hosted the Madiga swamy Maadaara Channaiah visiting the
Brahmin colony in response to convince latter that the Dalits should
shun conversion to other faiths. The Sangh Parivar obviously saw a
great opportunity in communalizing the Savanur issue to its own
advantage in its communal design. Who knows what is in store for
Savanur in future!

Disturbing Desperation

There is something menacing about the mode of protest of the Bhangis
of Savanur. The Dalit protest is historically characterized by
denunciation of the markers of their humiliating social status. Dr
Ambedkar had exhorted his followers to give up dragging dead animals,
eating their meat, discard caste indicative ornaments and practices
and even later launched a famous struggle against Mahar watans,
considered special rights of Dalits by others. Strangely, the Dalit
protest here used the very marker of their dehumanization. While it
sought to forcefully project their plight, it has also tacitly marked
their helplessness and separation from the mainstream Dalit movement.
Bhangis have been a miniscule minority among Dalits and are considered
untouchable even by other Dalits. As a result, they have always lived
in their own ghettoes. This bespeaks of a big malady of the dalit
movement, purportedly aimed at annihilation of castes, but
paradoxically using caste as its cementing force. It has failed to
realize despite persistent failure over six decades to keep its folks
together, that caste is no such a force; it rather is a divisive force
that splinters what looks together. Although desperation in Savanur
act is confined to the Bhangis, in some measure, it indicates the
state of generic Dalits, as it is perceived by the others. If the
Dalit movement as for instance in the heyday of the Dalit Sangharsh
Samiti in Karnataka was strong, such an act would have been
inconceivable.

Savanur prompts the entire Dalit movement to rethink its strategy in
face of repeated experience with failure to constitute 'Dalit'. It is
high time Dalits realized that their caste centric outlook to oppose
caste is not only theoretically and morally incorrect but also is
strategically and empirically wrong. It is high time they shunned the
caste idiom and regrouped themselves as a class.

Dr Anand Teltumbde is writer, political analyst and human rights
activist with CPDR, Mumbai.


------------------------------------

----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ZESTCaste] More courts for SC/STs on the anvil

 

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/More-courts-for-SC/STs-on-the-anvil/articleshow/6639562.cms

More courts for SC/STs on the anvil

TNN, Sep 28, 2010, 01.26am IST

BANGALORE: Atrocities against SC/STs won't be taken lightly any more.
The government on Monday proposed to increase the number of fast-track
courts to dispose of atrocities cases against them.

Chief minister B S Yeddyurappa has directed officials attached to the
civil rights enforcement (CRE) cell to ensure speedy disposal of cases
on atrocities committed on dalits, and promised to set up more special
courts to try such cases.

At present, there are seven special courts to try cases of atrocities
on SC/STs. If needed, more will be set up, Yeddyurappa said on Monday.
He chaired a meeting of the state-level committee on prevention of
atrocities on SC/STs, set up under his chairmanship.

The meeting which was to be held at least twice a year to review
atrocity cases and progress of investigation made by the CRE cell, met
for the first time after the BJP government came to power. Admitting
the delay in convening the committee meeting, Yeddyurappa said he will
hereafter hold the sittings once in six months.

FAKE CASTE CERTIFICATES

The CM also directed officials to take stringent action against those
involved in issuing fake caste certificates. As many as 632 cases have
been registered so far, and 373 are still pending for disposal.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
MARKETPLACE

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

[ZESTCaste] Nitish Govt 'conspiring' to deprive Dalits of vote rights: LJP

 

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nitish-govt-conspiring-to-deprive-dalits-of-vote-rights-ljp/689068/

Nitish Govt 'conspiring' to deprive Dalits of vote rights: LJP

Agencies Posted online: Tue Sep 28 2010, 09:21 hrs
Patna : The LJP on Monday accused the Nitish Kumar government of
"conspiring" to deprive poor and Dalits of their voting rights and
urged the Election Commission to take necessary steps to ensure their
participation in the polls.
"We have definite information that 30 per cent of the EPICs
distributed among the voters here for the 2010 Assembly polls are
fake... and NDA is behind it," an LJP delegation-led by its state
president Pashupati Kumar Paras complained to the Chief Electoral
Officer of Bihar.

Later, Paras said the state's NDA government had "conspired" with the
officials of its choice in the district to deprive Dalits and poor of
their voting rights by forging EPICS.

"We submitted a petition to the Commission seeking to take necessary
steps to ensure that no poor and Dalits, besides other sections of the
society are deprived of their fundamental right to vote," he added.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

[ZESTCaste] The Many Lives of Caste in Modern India

http://kafila.org/2010/09/27/the-many-lives-of-caste-in-modern-india/

The Many Lives of Caste in Modern India

Posted by: Aditya Nigam | September 27, 2010

[Following my previous post, 'We are Proud Hindus', there has been an
expected barrage of comments - all along very predictable lines. Most
of them, characteristically, turn every critique of reprehensible
caste practices of Hindu society into an expression of 'casteism' and
immediately displace the criticism to their favourite enemy, Islam.
For the benefit of readers who might be interested in a more reasoned
debate, I post here an essay, which was written some years ago and a
version of which published in South Asian Journal. This is just by
way of making my own position clear. - AN ]

Politics in contemporary India is marked by the 'resurgence' of 'caste
politics'. In a sense, this is true. The past two decades have seen a
dramatic collapse of the old political formations and parties, which
had dominated the politics of the Nehruvian era.[1] Even the movements
of that period, right up to the mid-1970s, were largely movements on
economic issues and questions of corruption, black-marketing, hoarding
and food shortages. Through the decade of the 1980s, there was a
gradual erosion of the Nehruvian secular-nationalist imagination, and
one of the factors responsible for it was the 're-emergence' of caste
in public discourse.

The watershed in this respect of course, was the famous 'Mandal
Commission' agitation – which has become something of a metaphor in
contemporary Indian politics. The Commission, which was instituted in
1978, during the Janata Party government, under the stewardship of
B.P. Mandal, a socialist leader from a 'backward caste', was given the
task of looking into the question of 'backwardness' of certain castes
and suggest remedies for its redressal. For about a decade after it
submitted its recommendations in 1980, it lay in cold storage after
the Congress under the leadership of Mrs Indira Gandhi (subsequently
taken charge of by her son Rajiv) returned to power. It was
implemented under extremely contentious circumstances in 1990 under
the Prime Ministership of V.P. Singh. As is well-known, its main
recommendations included 27 percent reservations in public employment
for these castes (known in India as the 'Other Backward Classes' or
OBCs).

As soon as the government announced its decision to implement the
Commission's recommendations, all hell broke loose. There were
widespread violent agitations all over North India with sons and
daughters of 'respectable families' taking to the streets. It was an
unprecedented sight to see these young people, generally cynical about
all political activity taking to road blockades, demonstrations,
picketing and such other activities. Many of them even committed
self-immolation. Equally interesting was the sight of the usually
cynical media backing the agitators to the hilt. New terms like
'mandalisation of politics' entered public political discourse. The
tone and tenor of the public debate in the media was illuminating for
a whole generation of people who had been brought up in modern secular
values of the Nehruvian era. This was especially so because they
seemed to suggest, almost one-sidedly, that caste was something that
we had already left behind and it was the vileness of VP Singh, who
wanted to cash in on such retrograde sentiments, for purely pragmatic
electoral purposes.

It needs to be borne in mind that this large group of OBCs, who
constituted close to 60 percent of the population, had a negligible
presence of about 4 percent in government employment, when these
recommendations were implemented. Also worth bearing in mind is the
fact that even this small representation in employment was restricted
to the lower rungs of government jobs. Even today, almost two decades
after the implementation of the Mandal Commission (starting 8
September 1993), a mere 6.87 percent jobs are filled by OBCs. Take for
example, the following information received through an RTI
application:

"Nearly 17 years after the implementation of 27% reservation for OBCs
in central government jobs on the basis of the Mandal Commission
recommendations, a mere 6.87% of those employed in various union
departments in Groups A, B, C and D services belong to the group.
Thus a significant 20% posts across categories and departments
reserved for OBCs remain unfilled raising doubts on the effective
implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations. Documents
obtained under the Right To Information Act (RTI Act) by Chennai-based
biomedical engineering and activist, E Muralidharan, reveal that just
1,93,228 OBC employees including 2,430 sweepers were employed in
different central government departments as on January 1, 2008."
(Times of India, August 31, 2010)

In other words, the overwhelming majority of public services were
monopolised by the small crust of upper castes. In one estimation made
by sociologist Satish Deshpande, about 20 percent of the population
controlled about 95 percent of all jobs. Deshpande has also recently
calculated the poverty-caste relationship on the basis of the National
Sample Survey Organisation consumption data which confirm the strong
relationship between low-caste status and poverty.[2] However, what is
relevant here is not merely the incidence of poverty among different
'backward' caste groups but more importantly, the fact that even among
the relatively better-off and educated sections of Dalits and OBCs,
access to public employment, especially at the higher levels is
severely restricted. In other words, as Ram Naresh Kushwaha, an OBC
parliamentarian had put it in a parliament debate in 1978, the upper
castes have always had informal reservations operating for them in
employment; jobs were reserved for them. Manusmriti itself, he had
claimed, was nothing other than a reservation of certain jobs for only
a certain category of people.[3]

What was interesting about the agitation and the highly charged public
debate that followed, was that it was entirely conducted, from the
side of the opponents of the Mandal Commission, in the most immaculate
secular and modern language of 'merit' and 'efficiency'. The question
was posed as one of dilution, if not the elimination, of merit at the
cost of getting in 'unworthy' and 'undeserving' people simply because
they happened to belong to certain castes. "Would you like to be
operated upon by a doctor who had became one through reservations?"
"Would you like to fly by an aircraft that was piloted by a
reservation pilot?" Such were the kinds of questions that were asked
by the anti-Mandalites in these discussions. Not once was the question
of upper-caste and brahminical privilege ever articulated as a
question of caste-privilege. Even more interesting was the fact that
the more sophisticated among the anti-Mandalites were prepared to
accept that there was a question of privilege involved here but that
should be addressed in terms of 'class': that 'economic' rather than
caste criteria should be made the basis of reservations. The question
was really one of poverty, they argued, rather than that of caste.

Now, this is an argument that actually erupted in public discourse in
the 1990s but has a fairly long and hallowed history. As evidence
shows, it was an argument that had been rehearsed over the decades by
the modernist upper caste leadership. Right from the days of the Kaka
Kalelkar Commission, set up in the mid-1950s for the purpose of
addressing the same questions that were later taken up by the Mandal
Commission, to parliamentary debates and more localised public
discussions, this was invariably the argument deployed by the
opponents of positive discrimination. As Christohpe Jaffrelot shows,
many members of the Kaka Kalelkar commission dissented from the
commission's recommendations and what is more, the Gandhian Kaka
Kalelkar himself started developing serious doubts even as he
submitted his report. Nehru, the immaculate modernist was the one who
finally gave the stamp of legitimacy to this position thus: "If we go
in for reservations on communal and caste basis, we swamp the bright
and able people and remain second-rate or third-rate".[4] On this one
question, then the Nehruvian elite and the Hindu Right were always in
complete agreement.

Was Nehru a casteist then? Were all those who opposed the Mandal
commission in the 1990s, who included respected scholars of the
country, also casteist? This is a question that is being asked today
by the Dalitbahujans.[5] My answer to this question would be that they
were not casteists – at least a large section of them were not. They
were opposing the 'bringing in' of caste into public discourse on very
modernist and secular grounds. They sincerely believed that talking in
terms of caste would be a regression into the past that they were so
desperately seeking to annihilate. The point that needs to be stressed
here is that this time round, caste was the banner of those who had
been oppressed by it. The recalcitrance of caste is not a mere
repetition of the older story. For in that story, it was the upper
castes that aloft held the banner of caste in order to put people 'in
their place'. Now things had decisively changed; the upper castes were
in constant and vehement denial. Somewhere here, in this denial lies
hidden the story of Indian modernity. In what follows, I will sketch
what I believe are the broad outlines of that story and underline some
of the complexities of present-day caste politics.

Let me go back to where I began this essay. Is there really a
'resurgence' of caste? Is it the case that the question of caste has
'suddenly' become important, implying thereby that till now such was
not the case? Is the general perception that was aired in the media
during the Mandal Commission controversy, that caste was simply
resurrected by VP Singh, a correct perception? The answer is both
'yes' and 'no'. Yes, because there was a sense in which caste had been
banished from public discourse and to that extent, its reappearance is
a new phenomenon. No, because this unpseakability of caste in public
discourse was limited to civil society, that is to the domain of the
secular modern institutions of society. And it was precisely this
unspeakability that made it impossible to challenge the continuing
domination of upper castes over all institutions and resources – for
it could not have been challenged in any other language.
Secular-modern language provided no way of posing this challenge –
just as it provided no vocabulary for challenging race-based
discrimination in the West.

Equally importantly, it had not disappeared from society at large. In
another realm, away from the watchful gaze of the modern elite, in the
domain of what Partha Chatterjee calls political society, caste was a
central category that framed the common ways of seeing and being in
the world. The secret story of our modernity is of course, lodged in
the first realm, that of civil society, for it is here that we see the
mutated upper caste modern Indian Self, in perpetual denial of caste
(and to some extent, religion) in all his/her splendour. There is no
denying that this modern Self is really and genuinely modern; it wants
to excise that shameful thing called caste from its memory. The
upper-caste-turned-modern Self does not ever want to be reminded of
this one aspect of his/her inheritance. It can deal with religion, for
that is something that 'we all have' – whether we are from the West or
from the East. But caste is a blot that has affected the psyche of the
mutated modern in ways that can be best expressed in Freudian terms:
Caste is the suppressed/ repressed, the 'unconscious' as it were, of
the modern moral Self (the Superego?). Yet, caste is the hidden
principle that gives it the access to all kinds of modern privileges
precisely because it functions, as Deshpande suggests, as
cultural/symbolic capital.

To the oppressed castes, especially the lowest among them, that is the
Dalits, this repression of caste appears as a conspiracy of the
brahminical castes to deprive them of their voice. It appears to them
to displace what is their bitter lived experience to another domain –
that of class, for instance. The story that the Dalit wants to narrate
can only be told with reference to the history of caste oppression. It
is there that the secret of their exclusion and cultural mutilation
lies. One of the critical elements of the recalcitrance of caste in
contemporary Indian politics is therefore, the search for a past, a
cultural legacy, a history and a sense of Self. The oppressive
structure of caste functioned, in relation to the Dalits in
particular, through their almost complete exclusion from 'society'
such as it was. Here I will not go into stories of daily humiliation
and degradation that was and has been part of Dalit life, as these are
by now fairly well articulated, documented and discussed. I will
merely briefly refer to one aspect of their exclusion: their exclusion
from any kind of access to learning – of whatever kind, including
elementary skills of reading and writing. The implications of this
forced exclusion are far greater than might appear at first glance.
For these took away from them any possibility of registering their own
history, creating their myths and literature – in other words,
deprived them of any sense of their own past. It was therefore, only
with the arrival of colonialism and the opening up of public spaces
and institutions to the Dalits, if in a limited fashion (because of
upper caste opposition) that these became accessible to them. It is
therefore, only in the early twentieth century, strictly speaking,
that the Dalits really found their voice – in the sense of being able
to record their experience of oppression and talk about it publicly.
And it was at this precise moment that the mutated upper caste modern
began to legislate a certain modern universalist language, decrying
all attempts to talk of caste oppression as 'casteism', a sign of
'backward consciousness'.

There is therefore a peculiar ambivalence that marks Dalit politics
and discourse today. On the one hand, it invests tremendous faith in
modernity because it is really with its onset that possibilities of
Dalit emancipation opened up in significant ways; on the other, it
exhibits a strong aversion to the dominant, secular-nationalist
discourse of modernity in India that it sees as irrevocably 'upper
caste' and the root of the re-institution of upper caste power over
modern institutions.

This ambivalence is visible not only in the field of cultural
politics, as it were, but equally in the field of politics as such. In
this field, the dynamic is somewhat different but what makes it
possible for the Dalit political formations like the BSP, to chart out
a course that radically questions the common sense of the secular
modern, is its deep distrust of the old nationalist and secular elite.
A case in point is the relationship of BSP and much of the Dalit
intelligentsia, with the emerging secular political formations,
especially in North India. It is well-known that here, in the state of
Uttar Pradesh, the Bahujan Samaj Party, has repeatedly gone into an
alliance with the main party of the Hindu Right, the Bharatiya Janata
Party. It has formed governments along with the BJP, not only in 1993
and 1997 but also in 2002, in the year of the Gujarat massacres of the
Muslims. In this period, when the BJP and its partner organisations of
the Sangh family have bared their fascist fangs, leaving nobody in any
doubt about their intentions, the BSP entered into an alliance and
formed a government with the BJP in UP, and its top leaders even
campaigned for it in Gujarat during the subsequent elections.

There are two levels of problems involved here. First, the actual
relations between different caste groups and second, the logic of
electoral politics. On the face of it, it only seems logical that in
order to break upper caste hegemony there should be a larger alliance
of the OBCs and Dalits. This had seemed to be a promising line of
action to many leaders of the late nineteenth early twentieth century
like Jyotiba Phule of Maharashtra and Periyar EVR Ramasamy Naicker of
what is today Tamil Nadu. Hence they had advocated the idea of a
'Nonbrahmin' unity (Periyar) or a unity of the Shudraatishudras
(Phule) in order to challenge the hegemony of the brahminical elite.
And up to a point this did have an impact in the first half of the
twentieth century, insofar as brahminical stranglehold over society in
these two regions was seriously challenged. Even Kanshi Ram, the chief
architect of the present Dalit upsurge in North India, believed that
his party should not simply be a Dalit party but a party of 'bahujans'
(literally, majority). Hence the name, Bahujan Samaj Party. The
bahujan samaj, in Kanshi Ram's rendering was to be forged through a
broad alliance of the Dalits, the backwards and the minorities –
particularly the Muslims. Kanshi Ram also saw clearly that the Dalits
alone, comprising no more than about 20 percent of the electorate in
any constituency, could not possibly challenge upper caste dominance.
Hence the aggressive slogan of the period of the rise of the BSP:
Tilak, tarazu aur talwar/ inko maro joote chaar (thrash the Brahmin,
the Bania and the Rajput with shoes).

The problem however, began after the first alliance of the BSP and the
Samajwadi Party led by Mulayam Singh Yadav, representing the backward
castes formed its government in UP in 1993. Within a short time it
became apparent that as soon as the political pact that was forged
between the parties moved toward the countryside, sharp conflicts
between the two groups began playing themselves out. It was during the
panchayat elections that the conflicts became really serious and many
Dalit leaders and intellectuals realised that much of their present
conflict in the villages was with the dominant backward castes who had
consolidated their hold following the post-independence land reforms.
In many states, it was these castes, comprising the erstwhile tenants,
now become landowners, who were their main oppressors. And they were
not willing to change their attitude towards Dalits in everyday
matters, even in the face of the political alliance at the state
level. In many areas it was they who had been preventing the Dalits
even from casting their votes.

More importantly, this was the period of the sharp rise of the Hindu
Right. Very soon, this threat of the Sangh combine was to become the
most important reference point for all future electoral-political
alliances. The parties of the OBCs, represented by Mulayam Singh and
Laloo Yadav in the two most important northern states of UP and Bihar,
positioned themselves firmly against the BJP and the Sangh combine. It
is worth remembering that in the period of the build-up to the
demolition of the Babri Masjid, it was these two leaders who had
displayed the most determined opposition to the BJP. Mulayam Singh in
fact used the entire force of the state machinery, during his chief
ministerhsip, to prevent the kar sevaks from demolishing the structure
of the masjid in November 1990. It was during this same period when LK
Advani's notorious Rath Yatra entered Bihar, en route to Ayodhya, that
Laloo Yadav displayed exemplary courage in arresting Advani, leading
to the eventual downfall of the VP Singh government of which Laloo was
a part. It was in this context, that the anti-communal, secular front
came into existence, and the OBC parties naturally acquired a crucial
position within it, given their stance. This is where the problems
began, as far as the BSP and the newly assertive Dalits were
concerned. To throw their lot with the secular front unconditionally
was to tie their own hands and throw themselves to the wolves. For the
conflict with the OBCs in the countryside was now playing itself out
in its most aggressive form.

This is where the deep distrust of the common sense of the
secular-nationalist, so ingrained in Dalit politics comes into play.
For, it did not really have a moment's hesitation in joining forces
with the BJP in forming a government and in a sense, it was to open
the floodgates for later realignments where parties like the Telegu
Desam Party and the AIADMK and DMK were to enter into alliances with
the BJP, in order to form the government at the Centre. Not only did
it form governments with the BJP, the BSP in its last round of
power-sharing even bent over backwards to help the BJP leaders in the
Babri Masjid demolition case. The point here is not simply that the
BSP went into a power-sharing alliance with the BJP, for there are
enough precedents of many other parties and groups doing the same in
different ways, in different times. Even the Left is not entirely free
of that taint. The point here is that it entered into this alliance
with a clear argument against the dichotomised mode of politics where
the 'communalism versus secularism' conflict was presented by the
secular front as simple common sense, as if it subsumed all other
conflicts and exhausted all other problems. This manner of privileging
the 'secular versus communal' conflict in a manner of speaking,
presented the secular front as a non-negotiable: you had to enter the
front only on the terms already set by it. There was no possibility of
any negotiation here, especially with regard to the backward caste
parties. It is here that despite its history of attempting to build an
anti-upper-caste-Hindu alliance, and despite the fact that it sees its
project as irreconcilable with the Hindutva project, the BSP displayed
its refusal to take any proposition as given and non-negotiable. The
sole concern that guided it was whether its move would help its own
project of Dalit liberation.

In this story of the recalcitrance of caste in contemporary India, one
thing is clear: The script of modernity in India has to be and is
being rapidly re-written. The upper caste secular claim to the modern
is being revealed, every day, every hour, as a mode of preserving
secular privileges and power that are inherited from an already
existing non-secular power.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] The term 'Nehruvian era' is being used here to refer to an era
that actually extends far beyond the person of Jawaharlal Nehru
himself – almost upto the beginning of the 1980s, when the terms of
political discourse and practice were still articulated within a
secular-nationalist framework that was put in place by the Nehruvian
leadership.

[2] For further details, see Satish Deshpande (2002), Contemporary
India: A Sociological View, Penguin India.

[3] See Lok Sabha Debates, Sixth Series, Vol. XXII, No. I, Lok Sabha
Secretariat, Feb. 23, 1978, Pp. 340-3

[4] Christophe Jaffrelot (2003) India's Silent Revolution: The Rise of
the low Castes in North Indian Politics, Permanent Black, Delhi. See
especially the discussion on pages 222-228.

[5] The term 'Dalitbahujan' is a recent coinage that refers to the
broad spectrum of lower caste groups ranging from the untouchable
castes, that is Dalits, to the other lower castes generally referred
to as Shudras in the language of the chaturvarna system.


------------------------------------

----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/

PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com

TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/

Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/