http://www.frontline.in/stories/20100312270511700.htm
INTERVIEW
'Dalit unity is undermined'
D. KARTHIKEYAN
Interview with Hugo Gorringe, Lecturer in Sociology at the University
of Edinburgh.
S. JAMES
Hugo Gorringe: "The notion of space is the central social idiom of the
Dalit struggle."
In the recent past, there has been a lot of debate on the emergence of
Dalit parties in Tamil Nadu's political sphere on the basis of Dalit
identity. A larger identity constructed by the Dravidian movement has
not only failed to transcend caste identities but has also suppressed
the Dalit question through its hegemony. In this interview to
Frontline, Hugo Gorringe, Lecturer in Sociology at the University of
Edinburgh and author of Untouchable Citizens: Dalit Movements and
Democratisation in Tamil Nadu (Sage 2005), talks about the emergence
of Dalit movements, Dravidian hegemony and the future of Dalit
politics in Tamil Nadu.
Gorringe has written several articles on caste, violence, protest and
policing. He was in Madurai recently. Excerpts:
How did the idea of doing research on a Dalit movement in Tamil Nadu evolve?
My father worked in the Tamil Nadu Theological Seminary (TTS) in
Madurai, so I grew up in Tamil Nadu between the ages of 4 and 11.
During these years, I was able to make good friends. After we left, I
had the opportunity to visit Madurai once every three or four years to
keep up the connection with my friends, maintain my Tamil and meet
people. The TTS is a place where Dalit theology is very important and
I was exposed to dialogues between Gandhi and Ambedkar on
untouchability as well as the social inequalities prevalent here. For
my bachelor's degree, I wrote a 10,000-word project about my
experience with Dalits in India. I thought that the project was easy
to do and also would give me opportunities to meet my friends.
During that project, though, I met more people and learned more about
persistent caste inequalities. Following up on that experience, and
realising that not much work had been done about Dalits and their
movements in English, I thought of filling that gap. That was how my
PhD project came about. Scholars like Michael Moffat (An Untouchable
Community in India: Structure and Consensus; Princeton University
Press, 1979) had argued that caste was based on structural consensus
and that groups at the lower order replicated the forms and
relationships of those at the upper strata.
Others argue that the lower caste groups in fact fight against caste.
The situation has changed dramatically since Moffat's work was
published, and Dalit movements have mobilised across the State. I
wanted to understand these contemporary caste relations and chart the
challenges to caste hierarchy.
How important was your PhD in developing your understanding of caste
and exploitation that continue to frame the lives of Dalits?
My PhD introduced me to the everyday life of Dalits. Once I got to
know members of the movement, my PhD research took me into villages
and urban slums that I had not visited before and opened my eyes to
the subtle manifestations and the everyday practical difficulties of
Dalits and how they are discriminated against both in civil as well as
political society.
One of the significant features of your work was the concept of
production of space and reclamation of rights to public space. How
important is this concept in the case of Dalits?
The notion of space is the central social idiom of the Dalit struggle.
At least superficially, the transformation of Puthiya Tamizhagam (PT)
and Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) as political movements has
enabled them to claim space within urban areas on par with other
parties as can be seen in wall posters, flagpoles and murals.
Likewise, few towns and villages in the urban periphery remain
untouched by the symbols of Dalit politics. Given the immense
struggles and battles that ensued to gain acceptance for these
symbols, the fact that they are now commonplace in itself is extremely
significant. On a more concrete level, Dalits in urban areas continue
to live predominantly in slums or particular enclaves. Urban space in
that sense is still marked by caste; people seeking homes for rent are
often asked about their caste or are asked to get references from
upper caste people before being offered a place. In rural areas,
Dalits still reside in cheris outside the village and must struggle
for access to roads and common resources.
Even in the case of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government's
Samathuvapuram project, [a residential area] where people of different
castes live side by side, lack of engagement between them in common
cases and spaces indicate the continuing resilience of caste
sentiment.
How important do you think is the emergence of Dalit parties such as
the VCK and the PT in Tamil Nadu's political sphere?
The rise of parties like the VCK and the PT is precisely about
compelling the Dravidian parties to accept Dalits as political
players. In the case of the VCK, so far they seem to have achieved
that but the accusations that they levelled against other Dalit
politicians – as being non-representative and out of touch with the
realities of untouchability – are now being levelled against the VCK.
Dalits I have spoken to felt that there are so many pressing issues
that need to be addressed, but the VCK leaders have failed to address
them in their pursuit of larger issues like the Sri Lankan conflict.
Whilst it is a real sign of progress that a 'Dalit Party' can speak
out on wider issues, the failure to engage with the concerns of their
core constituents can foster disillusionment.
Dravidian hegemony, achieved through the Dravidian parties' investment
in symbolic capital such as social honour and trust and creation of
symbols, idioms of glorious past, was one of the major reasons for the
suppression of the Dalit question. How far do you think the Dalit
parties are able to challenge the hegemony?
The Dalit parties' failure to challenge Dravidian hegemony is one of
action rather than analysis. If one listens to [VCK leader]
Thirumavalavan in Dalit circles or reads his work or that of D.
Ravikumar [Member of the Legislative Assembly representing the VCK],
they offer an insightful analysis of brahminism and of the influence
of Dravidian movement and they explain how Dalits buy into that
rhetoric. Despite this, the VCK has allied itself with both main
Dravidian parties rather than attempting to consolidate a Third Front.
The pertinent question is whether the decision to ally with Dravidian
parties is pragmatic or principled.
Initially it was a pragmatic move to escape persecution and establish
the VCK as a political player, but increasingly they seem to be buying
into the system. Yes, they have gained some concessions and have given
a voice to marginalised people to some extent, but when leaders of
resistance movements fall at the feet of Dravidian leaders, you see
the transformation of figures of liberation to establishment figures.
There is an accusation that the inclusive rhetoric of the Dravidian
movement bypassed Dalits only to empower the regionally dominant
middle castes who oppress Dalits and commit atrocities against them?
How far is this true?
The Dravidian movement was always anti-Brahmin but was never
systematically anti-brahminical as a philosophy and never has
campaigned for that. In fact they never challenged the structural
hierarchy except in symbolic ways, meaning that we still have caste
oppression both at village and urban areas by dominant castes who have
supplanted the Brahmins as power holders but follow brahminical
policies. Brahminism continues to hold sway.
The egalitarian ideology of Periyar has not come into fruition. Even
Vanniyars and Thevars had to struggle for inclusion into Tamil
politics. Indeed, the history of Tamil politics has been one of
successive struggles by marginalised sections in society. The failure
of Dravidian parties is perhaps best exemplified by the fact that
political contestation is still articulated and carried out on caste
lines.
Still the struggle continues?
Yes, after Vanniyars and Thevars, it was Pallars (Devendrars) and
Paraiyars (Adi Dravidars) and now it is Arunthathiyars who are
struggling for political inclusion. This happens precisely because
caste continues to have symbolic and material substance and remains an
important category of practice. This is not to say that social
relations have been static. By and large, there is a widespread
decline of dependency among Dalits. But the advancement of
marginalised communities is largely incidental to, rather than a
product of, Dravidian policies.
S. THANTHONI
Dr K. Krishnaswamy, founder, Puthiya Tamizhagam.
Even Dalit movements are mobilising on caste issues, and it is a
paradox to see that anti-caste movements are reinforcing the social
structures they want to eradicate. There are a number of reasons for
that; firstly, Dravidian hegemony is so strong that whatever the
leaders say and think, Dalits cling to a Tamilian identity. The
failure of parties like the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Communist
Party of India and the CPI(M) testify to that.
Secondly, it reflects a lack of democracy among Dalit movements. The
focus on big leaders, which reflects the dominant form of Tamil
politics, itself leads to division and status competition. Thirdly,
movements have tended to be particularly sensitive to atrocities,
which is important in itself, but perhaps also entails a failure to
work systematically against caste divisions. Even as the VCK recruits
members from the backward castes, thus, they struggle to gain a
foothold amongst Pallars and Arunthathiyars. The result is that now
each caste has its own heroes and mass figures that are inimical to
Dalit unity.
Talking about "heroes", Dalit movements of late have been involved in
reinventing their own caste histories and glorifying "heroes" from the
past. Could this be seen as discourses of empowerment?
Thol. Thirumavalavan, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi leader, calling
on Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi at his residence. M.K. Stalin, now
Deputy Chief Minister, is also seen. A file picture. Dalit movements
started off as autonomous political forces but have succumbed to
Dravidian hegemony in the belief that they cannot stand alone.
Caste histories can well be seen as discourses of empowerment and we
shouldn't belittle their importance because they provide at least
symbolic forms of capital and have been instrumental in altering the
aspirations and self-perceptions of the subaltern groups.
But do you not think that there is a danger of this form of symbolic
capital not turning into social action?
Yes, there is a double-edged character for this as they detract the
movements from any sense of common struggle and they can lead to
status competition among Dalits as in the case of Devendra Kula
Vellalars. From that perspective, campaign strategies which are formed
on common issues such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1999, World Conference Against Racism facilitate cross caste
mobilisation.
Perhaps, the best example of such awareness and mobilisation is
Ambedkar's Birth Centenary, which made him a leader of pan-Indian
stature and took him to the remotest corners as champion of the
oppressed. If Dalit movements can build on such platforms, or those of
land rights, there is more hope for Dalit liberation than the
advancement of particular communities.
Most Dalit scholars believe that the idea of resistance politics
identified with the VCK has become a casualty after its entry into
electoral politics.
The compulsions of electoral politics, which engender compromise and
hinder spontaneity, are the reasons for that. Thirumavalavan could
rush to villages during the 1990s and interact with people; now it's
not happening and he cannot do that. Many are disillusioned with this
professionalisation and bureaucratisation and the focus on Tamil
nationalism. The seeming desire to become a general party rather than
focussing on issues largely affecting Dalits is rather depressing for
some cadres though others revel in the party's strength. But having
said this, all the movements suffer from this malaise.
We have to ask whether the Dalit struggle can be advanced by espousing
Tamil nationalism. The VCK has been able to gain some concessions and
goodwill from its political partners through this strategy, but we
must ask at what cost these gains have been won. The VCK mobilisation
in Karnataka, for instance, is resented by other Dalit parties who see
them as primarily a Tamil party. Dalit unity is thus undermined.
What are the significant areas where the VCK still wields a lot of influence?
In some key areas, the VCK continues to inspire people to follow them,
and some shades of women's empowerment are also taking place. One
notable thing is that in Madurai, R. Pandiammal – whom I mentioned in
my book – has risen to become the district secretary from being a
grass-roots worker. This move needs to be applauded as not many
parties have elevated active women to positions of responsibility.
Secondly, they continue to carve out spaces in terms of book launches,
art festivals and conferences. One VCK member told me that
Thirumavalavan talks about Dalit issues in these platforms in a way
that is no longer possible on political platforms. Finally, there is a
suggestion by many people that the VCK is now engaged in the murkier
forms of politics like katta panchayats (kangaroo courts). On the one
hand this heralds the party's arrival as a significant political
player – either because rumours are spread about them or because they
are powerful enough to engage in such activities. On the other it
raises questions about the party's ultimate objectives. If the aim is
a share of political power then this is a step in the right direction,
but if the aim is to transform politics and challenge caste
hierarchies, then this is a retrograde step.
Your view on the question of compartmental reservation…
M. KARUNAKARAN
A rally led by Thirumavalavan in support of Sri Lankan Tamils in
Chennai on May 5, 2009. Dalits feel that there are so many pressing
issues that need to be addressed, but the VCK leaders have failed to
address them in their pursuit of larger issues like the Sri Lankan
conflict.
I am deeply sceptical about the Arunthathiyar reservation. For a
start, if the State filled the 18 per cent available [to the Scheduled
Castes] fully and properly there would be no need for compartmental
reservation. Although it is true that the Arunthathiyars are the
weakest of the main Dalit castes, this move can be seen as a form of
'divide and rule' that channels Dalit mobilisation into caste-based
struggles rather than anti-caste struggles.
Furthermore, the issue of reservation is particularly important
because the persistence of caste in contemporary Tamil Nadu, for me at
least, rests less on 'purity and pollution' and more on the question
of identity, honour and caste pride. Compartmental reservation feeds
into this dynamic and fuels the logic of identity-based politics. It
does not help to overcome the dialectic between honour and
humiliation, whereas general schemes like the National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme at least have the potential to transcend
caste boundaries.
Is there any scope for Dalit parties to become politically self-autonomous?
Dalit movements here started off as autonomous political forces but
have succumbed to Dravidian hegemony in the belief that they cannot
stand alone. The Third Front in 1999 and actor Vijaykant's limited
success signals that there is scope for non-Dravidian politics, but
there have been no sustained attempts to build up such a campaign.
This indicates that Dalit parties are caught up in the workings of
everyday Tamil politics, with the result that the options open to them
are limited to Tamil nationalism, idolisation of Periyar at a
rhetorical level and the symbolic occupation of space. Only if Dalit
movements stand apart from the Dravidian parties will we get a sense
of their autonomy.
What are your current projects?
I am currently reading a lot of literature to think more theoretically
about the underpinnings of caste and caste conflicts, thinking through
workings of social power and the way in which everyday interactions
form the basis of caste structures.
Such a bottom-up perspective offers an insight into why caste
continues to inform everyday life even 60 years after Independence. I
am also considering the possibility of carrying out a follow-up study
on Dalit politics in Tamil Nadu that would chart the changes in Dalit
mobilisation over the past decade. The vibrant Dalit movements that I
studied in 1999 are now established political parties and I am keen to
tease out the implications of this shift.
------------------------------------
----
INFORMATION OVERLOAD?
Get all ZESTCaste mails sent out in a span of 24 hours in a single mail. Subscribe to the daily digest version by sending a blank mail to ZESTMedia-digest@yahoogroups.com, OR, if you have a Yahoo! Id, change your settings at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/join/
PARTICIPATE:-
On this list you can share caste news, discuss caste issues and network with like-minded anti-caste people from across India and the world. Just write to zestcaste@yahoogroups.com
TELL FRIENDS TO SIGN UP:-
If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTCaste by sending a blank mail to ZESTCaste-subscribe@yahoogroups.com OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, by visiting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join/
Also have a look at our sister list, ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
ZESTCaste-digest@yahoogroups.com
ZESTCaste-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ZESTCaste-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
